<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Software Informer Forum - Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
		<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/topic/2856/google-fixes-chrome-holes/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Google fixes Chrome holes.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/9742/#p9742</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>chrome is getting better , in this case it s easy to write css files .But ie is a nightmare&nbsp; <img src="http://software.informer.com/forum/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (yeli design)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/9742/#p9742</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/9657/#p9657</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes as said Google chrome is considered to be the best</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Engagedots)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/9657/#p9657</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/7640/#p7640</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have it but like Safari&#039;s ease of use.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Greenman)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 10:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/7640/#p7640</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/6131/#p6131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rhadu wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Google Chrome is the best!</p></blockquote></div><p>Totally agree with you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Crusal Peter)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/6131/#p6131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/6108/#p6108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m glad to hear that news. Google Chrome is my favorite browser too despite its loopholes. I still prefer it as compared to the other browsers because of its speed and ease of use.I just hope that they get to fix all the bugs soon. :0</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kylie)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/6108/#p6108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5722/#p5722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome ist the best!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rhadu)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5722/#p5722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5684/#p5684</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I had installed Software Informer a few weeks ago but I got mixed up with all the work that I had to do and I forgot about it. I updated my favorite software updater recently, SuMo, but I was a little bit disappointed with how it worked lately, giving many “false alarms” and taking me every time to a web page that is filled with ads. So I remembered that I wanted to try Software Informer, and I finally did. The first good thing is that it found the same number of installed programs as SuMo, 92. The surprise was that it found more updates, 38, 7 more than SuMo did.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Waleed Raza)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5684/#p5684</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5284/#p5284</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there - I design education courses in Moodle and have to test my work on all Browsers to see how it functions. Chrome is actually too smart for my system: Moodle fails to recognise it in some respects. For instance, it will not provide access to the HTML Editor. However, I have been introduced to COOLIRIS through Chrome; and embed its &quot;wall of images&quot; as a Resource in every Course.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Paul Jacobson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5284/#p5284</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5031/#p5031</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>bruh i found google crome to be awsome, but then my cookie settings or something prevented me from doing anything <img src="http://software.informer.com/forum/img/smilies/sad.png" width="15" height="15" alt="sad" />&nbsp; <img src="http://software.informer.com/forum/img/smilies/sad.png" width="15" height="15" alt="sad" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (War Hammer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/5031/#p5031</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google fixes Chrome holes]]></title>
			<link>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/4800/#p4800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just before the Black Hat security conference begins, Google has patched seven secuity holes in its stable version of Chrome and begun an effort to speed up the software industry&#039;s response to such vulnerabilities.</p><p>Google paid two $1,337 bounties for work that let Chrome avoid critical security problems by sidestepping vulnerabilities in Windows and the widely used glibc software library, according to a Monday blog post about Chrome 5.0.375.125 by Jason Kersey of Google&#039;s Chrome team. </p><p>Also through its program to reward those who find Chrome security holes, Google paid those who found three high-risk vulnerabilities and one medium-risk vulnerability. The final issue, a low-risk problem, elicited no payment. </p><p>For more on this story, see <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20011736-264.html" target="_blank">Google fixes Chrome holes</a>, seeks security reform on CNET News.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Caramelka)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://software.informer.com/forum/post/4800/#p4800</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
